Correct!
2. The thoracic CT shows a new intravascular metallic fragment

The thoracic CT shows that the metallic fragment within the right ventricular apex is still present and is unchanged. No pulmonary venous thromboemboli are present. The pericardium remains normal; there is no evidence of pericardial effusion to indicate right ventricular wall perforation. However, the examination is not unchanged from previous- there is a new metallic focus within the left lower lobe pulmonary artery (Figure 6, compare Figure 5 to Figure 3).

Figure 6. Following the attempted percutaneous retrieval procedure, a new metallic fragment is seen in the left lower lobe pulmonary artery. This metallic focus appears to loop on itself in the artery with two components along the opposite margins of the left lower lobe pulmonary artery, creating the impression of a flexible metallic focus conforming to an upside down “U” shape within the artery. Compare to panels A-C in Figure 2 which shows the left lower lobe pulmonary artery to be patent and free of an intravascular foreign body.

The repeat thoracic CT (Figure 6) shows a new metallic fragment located within the left lower lobe pulmonary artery, representing a fragment of wire or snare related to the attempted percutaneous retrieval of the metallic foreign body in the apex of the right ventricle. Another percutaneous retrieval procedure for the metallic foreign body in the right ventricle is planned by interventional radiology, but no attempt to remove the right ventricular fragment will be attempted; rather, cardiovascular surgery has been consulted regarding the need for removal for the latter.

Diagnosis: Inferior vena cava filter fracture with migration of fragment into the right ventricle, complicated by pulmonary artery non-thrombotic embolization of an additional metallic fragment related to attempted percutaneous retrieval.

References

  1. Illman JE, Maleszewski JJ, Byrne SC, Gotway MB, Kligerman SJ, Foley TA, Young PM, Bois JP, Malik N, Morris JM, Araoz PA. Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies in and around the heart. Future Cardiology 2016, in press.
  2. Wang W, Zhou D, Obuchowski N, Spain J, An T, Moon E. Fracture and migration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective review of 741 consecutive implantations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Nov;24(11):1719-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nicholson W, Nicholson WJ, Tolerico P, Taylor B, Solomon S, Schryver T, McCullum K, Goldberg H, Mills J, Schuler B, Shears L, Siddoway L, Agarwal N, Tuohy C. Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 8;170(20):1827-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, Waltman AC, Geller SC, Fan CM. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology. 2000 Jul;216(1):54-66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Home/Imaging